TracegenceNever fear a document audit again
Standards

The clauses your auditor cites are the clauses we check.

Concrete rulebook clauses, not 'compatible with all standards'. Every claim below is grounded in a specific section of the actual standard.

Open compliance and standards books on a reading desk
SQF EDITION 9BRCGS ISSUE 9FDA 21 CFR 117ISO 22000§2.4.6 ALLERGEN CONTROL…allergen test methods on every CoA…CITED IN REJECTIONSQF §2.4.6
SQF Edition 9

§2.4.6 Allergen control

Validates allergen test methods on every CoA and signed-by-QA-manager attestation.

SQF Edition 9

§2.4.8 Lot traceability

Cross-doc consistency: lot ID on CoA must equal shipping doc and label.

SQF Edition 9

§5.2.1 Document signing

Unsigned CoAs auto-rejected. Signature presence + role check encoded.

BRCGS Issue 9

§3.5 Supplier approval

Each raw material has a current CoA from an approved supplier with valid date.

BRCGS Issue 9

§6.2 Product defence

Fraud model flags altered PDFs, layered fonts, missing signature blocks.

FDA 21 CFR Part 117

§117.305 Records

No backdating. Records are dated, signed, and indelible by DB constraint.

ISO 22000

FSMS documentation

Document-controlled procedures, retained records, validated against the FSMS scope.

FSSAI

Schedule IV hygiene

Sanitation log enforcement, pest-control intervals, calibration cycles.

HACCP

Critical Control Point evidence

CCP records typed, indexed, and expiry-tracked at 30/14/7/1-day intervals.

Bring your own corpus. The RAG ingest command embeds .txt / .md / .pdf rulebook files; replace the fixtures with your licensed standards and re-run python manage.py rag_ingest.

Try it on your own document.

Spin up a tenant, upload a CoA, watch the engine cite the failing clause.